America is lost! Must we fall beneath the blow? Or have we resources
that may repair the mischief? What are those resources? Should they be sought
in distant Regions held by precarious Tenure, or shall we seek them at home
in the exertions of a new policy?
The situation of the Kingdom is novel, the policy that is to govern it
must be novel likewise, or neither adapted to the real evils of the present
moment, or the dreaded ones of the future.
For a Century past the Colonial Scheme has been the system that has guided
the Administration of the British Government. It was thoroughly known that
from every Country there always exists an active emigration of unsettled,
discontented, or unfortunate People, who failing in their endeavours to
live at home, hope to succeed better where there is more employment suitable
to their poverty. The establishment of Colonies in America might probably
increase the number of this class, but did not create it; in times anterior
to that great speculation, Poland contained near 10,000 Scotch Pedlars;
within the last thirty years not above 100, occasioned by America offering
a more advantageous asylum for them.
A people spread over an immense tract of fertile land, industrious because
free, and rich because industrious, presently became a market for the Manufactures
and Commerce of the Mother Country. An importance was soon generated, which
from its origin to the late conflict was mischievous to Britain, because
it created an expense of blood and treasure worth more at this instant,
if it could be at our command, than all we ever received from America. The
wars of 1744, of 1756, and 1775, were all entered into from the encouragements
given to the speculations of settling the wilds of North America.
It is to be hoped that by degrees it will be admitted that the Northern
Colonies, that is those North of Tobacco, were in reality our very successful
rivals in two Articles, the carrying freight trade, and the Newfoundland
fishery. While the Sugar Colonies added above three millions a year to the
wealth of Britain, the Rice Colonies near a million, and the Tobacco ones
almost as much; those more to the north, so far from adding anything to
our wealth as Colonies, were trading, fishing, farming Countries, that rivalled
us in many branches of our industry, and had actually deprived us of no
inconsiderable share of the wealth we reaped by means of the others. This
compartative view of our former territories in America is not stated with
any idea of lessening the consequence of a future friendship and connection
with them; on the contrary it is to be hoped we shall reap more advantages
from their trade as friends than ever we could derive from them as Colonies;
for there is reason to suppose we actually gained more by them while in
actual rebellion, and the common open connection cut off, than when they
were in obedience to the Crown; the Newfoundland fishery taken into the
Account, there is little doubt of it.
The East and West Indies are conceived to be the great commercial supports
of the Empire; as to the Newfoundland fishery time must tell us what share
we shall reserve of it. But there is one observation which is applicable
to all three; they depend on very distant territorial possessions, which
we have little or no hopes of retaining from their internal strength, we
can keep them only by means of a superior Navy. If our marine force sinks,
or if in consequence of wars, debts, and taxes, we should in future find
ourselves so debilitated as to be involved in a new War, without the means
of carrying it on with vigour, in these cases, all distant possessions must
fall, let them be as valuable as their warmest panegyrists contend.
It evidently appears from this slight review of our most important dependencies,
that on them we are not to exert that new policy which alone can be the
preservation of the British power and consequence. The more important they
are already, the less are they fit instruments in that work. No man can
be hardy enough to deny that they are insecure; to add therefore to their
value by exertions of policy which shall have the effect of directing any
stream of capital, industry, or population into those channels, would be
to add to a disproportion already an evil. The more we are convinced of
the vast importance of those territories, the more we must feel the insecurity
of our power; our view therefore ought not to be to increase but preserve
them.